Understanding Sentencing: Your Questions Answered

Our experienced legal team at Jackson Law is committed to providing clarity about the legal process to our clients. This includes understanding how sentencing is determined after a conviction. Read on for answers to some of the most commonly asked questions.

Who Is Responsible for Deciding a Convicted Defendant’s Sentence?

Typically, the task of sentencing a defendant falls to the judge, even if the case was heard by a trial jury. Jurors are routinely instructed to focus solely on determining guilt or innocence and not on potential consequences. There are rare instances, such as during some death penalty cases in certain states, where the jury may recommend a sentence, but the final imposition of the death penalty is subject to the judge’s agreement.

How Do We Know What the Punishments for Crimes Are?

Sentencing guidelines are frequently outlined in the specific legislations under which defendants are prosecuted. For instance, a law might categorize certain actions as misdemeanors with associated fines up to a specified amount or jail time. Alternatively, some statutes may designate behavior as misdemeanors or felonies without detailing corresponding punishments; these are usually set out in another section of the law that provides general sentencing frameworks for such crimes.

For those seeking a clearer picture of what to anticipate in terms of sentencing upon conviction, the following resources could be of assistance:

• Scheduling a paid consultation with a seasoned private defense attorney, who can typically forecast potential sentences.
• Discussing your case with a public defender’s office representative.
• Seeking informal guidance from relatives or friends who have legal expertise or connections.

Is Sentencing Consistent Across Similar Offenses?

Sentences can vary significantly from one case to another. Some jurisdictions have enacted mandatory sentencing laws, demanding uniform sentences for particular offenses, reflecting a movement to eliminate perceived judicial flexibility and ensure consistency. Federal laws previously mandating fixed sentences now often serve as advisory guidelines.

More usually, judges have the discretion to consider a range of factors when determining sentences, ensuring that each sentence is tailored not just to the crime but also to the individual circumstances of the offender.

What Considerations Influence Judges’ Sentencing Decisions?

Judges may weigh numerous mitigating factors when they have the freedom to set the sentence. These can include the offender having little to no prior criminal record, participation as an accessory rather than the principal actor in the crime, crimes committed under duress or significant pressure, and offenses conducted in a manner unlikely to result in harm.

Conversely, aggravating factors may prompt harsher sentences. These can include previously committing similar offenses, brutality during the crime, or the presence of legislated aggravating factors such as using a weapon during the offense.

Are Alternative Sentences an Option?

Absolutely. Your attorney can request alternate sentences which may encompass suspended sentences, probation, victim compensation, community service, or diversion programs for minor misdemeanors, particularly those related to substance use.

For further information or legal assistance regarding sentencing or any other legal matters, you can reach our dedicated team at Jackson Law at 650-587-8556. We’re here to guide you through the complexities of the legal system with compassion and skill.